SAN DIEGO (AP) - The San Diego City Council has decided to have the city sue Mayor Bob Filner to recover costs from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the mayor's former communications director.
The city attorney's office said Tuesday that the Council decided unanimously to ask a court to require Filner to pay all damages and attorney fees if he and the city are found liable.
Irene McCormack Jackson sued the mayor and the city last week, alleging the mayor asked her to work without panties, demanded kisses and told her he wanted to see her naked.
The decision comes hours before the Council was to consider a request by Filner's attorney to have the city pay his legal fees.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.
A City Council that overwhelmingly wants Mayor Bob Filner to resign is being asked to pay the beleaguered leader's legal bills in a lawsuit filed by his former communications director that accuses him of asking her to work without panties, demanding kisses and telling her he wanted to see her naked.
The City Council was to consider the request late Tuesday as dueling efforts got underway to recall San Diego's first Democratic leader in 20 years.
Seven of nine City Council members have urged Filner to resign, ensuring stiff opposition to paying his legal expenses.
Filner's attorney, Harvey Berger, asked that the city cover the mayor's legal bills in a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by his former communications director, Irene McCormack Jackson. The lawsuit claims the mayor asked her to work without panties, demanded kisses, told her he wanted to see her naked, and dragged her in a headlock while whispering in her ear.
Ann Ravel, chairwoman of the California Fair Political Practices Commission, said an official cannot accept more than $440 a year in donated services. Campaign money can be used only to defend against alleged violations of the state's campaign finance law.
An official can, however, create a legal defense fund under state law, Ravel said, leaving a possible avenue if the City Council rebuffs Filner.
Seven women have offered detailed accounts of Filner's unwanted advances, including touching and slobbering kisses.
Filner, who is 70 and divorced, said Friday he would enter two weeks of "intensive" therapy Aug. 5, defying calls from his own party leaders to resign. The former 10-term congressman is less than eight months into a four-year term as mayor.
Land-use surveyor Michael Pallamary published a newspaper notice Sunday to begin a recall bid, two days after gay rights activist and newspaper publisher Stampp Corbin did so. Pallamary accused Corbin of being a stealth supporter of the mayor and threatened to file a complaint with the San Diego County district attorney's office alleging election law violations.
Pallamary said Corbin would make little effort to collect the more than 100,000 signatures needed to get a recall measure on the ballot, setting it up to fail and preventing another recall drive for six months.
Corbin denied the accusation Tuesday, saying Pallamary or anyone else was welcome to join the recall drive. He said he wouldn't pay anyone to collect signatures - a common practice in California - but that anyone could visit his office to sign the petition or pick up blank forms to circulate.
Corbin, who was appointed chairman of a city commission under Filner, declined to say if he voted for Filner or how he would cast his ballot in a recall. He said his motive was to bring swift resolution to the controversy.
"What I'm saying is, let the people of San Diego decide," he said. "There's nothing going on in the city, in City Hall. Everyone is focused on this scandal. That is not good for this city."
Confusion over whether recall petitions can circulate concurrently isn't the only procedural flaw uncovered since the mayor came under pressure to resign. The city attorney's office says a rule that voters must cast a ballot on a recall to be eligible to pick a replacement should be repealed because a federal judge struck down a nearly identical law during the successful 2003 recall of California Gov. Gray Davis.