Comments for Obama Calls on Congress to Pass 'Buffett Rule' Tax Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: Anna on Apr 3, 2012 at 12:11 PM
I dont agree with everything from the dems and I dont disagree with everything from the repubs, but I cannot side with people like you who are just mean. There is no way to have a sensible discussion when you are so filled with hate.
Posted by: ditsey on Apr 1, 2012 at 08:11 AM
I enjoy most buffets; it's a shame we'd have to pay a new tax on tasty food. Now, for some of the buffets, the quality alone should force them to be taxed out of existence, but Id rather have no tax and keep the crappy ones, then to tax and get rid of them all. what a world.
Posted by: ron paul on Mar 31, 2012 at 12:47 PM
heres a better idea, the secretary rule, ie the secretary should pay 15% tax, lower the workers tax to 15% instead of raising investors tax rate :) would a demorat ever think of that
Posted by: arlene
Location: Spanish Springs
on Mar 31, 2012 at 12:45 PM
Quit worrying about the rich who have the brains to start companies to hire the smaller person. Get your BUDGET in gear and cutwasting the american hard earned money for your socialist tactics. Oh but then you will be out in 2013. Go back to your community service work in Chicago and don't forget to take your health freak wife with you. (1500 calorie meals on us)
Posted by: y on Mar 31, 2012 at 12:31 PM
Points of interest:
Marxists define "fair" as everyone (except elites) shares the misery equally.
High taxes means low investments (ie fewer jobs)
The top 10% earners in US already pay 50% of taxes. How much is enough? 49% of Americans pay NOTHING.
More taxes means bigger IRS to collect them.
I dont agree with everything from the dems and I dont disagree with everything from the repubs, but I cannot side with people like you who are just mean. There is no way to have a sensible discussion when you are so filled with hate.
I enjoy most buffets; it's a shame we'd have to pay a new tax on tasty food. Now, for some of the buffets, the quality alone should force them to be taxed out of existence, but Id rather have no tax and keep the crappy ones, then to tax and get rid of them all. what a world.
heres a better idea, the secretary rule, ie the secretary should pay 15% tax, lower the workers tax to 15% instead of raising investors tax rate :) would a demorat ever think of that
Quit worrying about the rich who have the brains to start companies to hire the smaller person. Get your BUDGET in gear and cutwasting the american hard earned money for your socialist tactics. Oh but then you will be out in 2013. Go back to your community service work in Chicago and don't forget to take your health freak wife with you. (1500 calorie meals on us)
Points of interest: Marxists define "fair" as everyone (except elites) shares the misery equally. High taxes means low investments (ie fewer jobs) The top 10% earners in US already pay 50% of taxes. How much is enough? 49% of Americans pay NOTHING. More taxes means bigger IRS to collect them.