A dispute between an Austrian Holocaust research center and an organization representing Vienna's Jewish committee over access to a vast archive has prompted a group of academics to withdraw support for the center, saying independent research is no longer possible, according to a letter obtained Tuesday by The Associated Press.

The Vienna Wiesenthal Institute for Holocaust Studies began provisional operations in January. Its purpose is to give researchers access to roughly 8,000 files of the late Nazi hunter Simon Wiesenthal and to parts of a vast archive belonging to Jewish Community Vienna, which represents the city's Jewish Community.

But officials at the institute say Jewish Community Vienna is limiting access to the archive.

Earlier this month, some officials of the institute - including
Anton Pelinka, the former chairman of the executive committee, and
business manager Ingo Zechner - announced they were quitting,
saying scholars would not be able to do independent research due to
archive restrictions imposed by the Jewish community.

In the letter obtained by the AP, 12 of the institute's
15-member international academic advisory board said they, too,
were dropping out.

"The International Advisory Board of the Vienna Wiesenthal
Institute has noted with increasing concern that the conditions
under which the institute could carry out its work with the
necessary degree of scholarly independence can no longer be met,"
the academics wrote in the letter, which was dated Monday.

"On the basis of the information available to us, and in view
of the resignations ... we conclude that the board no longer serves
a useful purpose."

The letter was co-signed by, among others, Yehuda Bauer,
professor of Holocaust Studies at the Hebrew University of
Jerusalem, David Bankier, head of the International Institute for
Holocaust Research at Yad Vashem and Tom Segev, an Israeli
historian, journalist and Wiesenthal biographer.

Bauer, who was honorary chairman of the advisory board, said in
an e-mail to the AP that he and others who resigned doubted that
constructive academic work was possible in the current atmosphere.

"Like my colleagues, I agreed to become the honorary chairman
of the (academic advisory board) on the assumption it would be a
cooperative venture between the state, the city, the university and
the (Jewish Community Vienna)," Bauer wrote.

"The controversies that then arose and led to the resignations
of a number of leading personalities was the opposite of what I,
and other colleagues, had expected."

On the day of his resignation, Zechner explained that the
biggest problem was that the Jewish community had agreed to only
open the 1919 to 1970 section of its archival material and only a
limited selection from those years. It had also insisted on
reserving the right to remove pieces at will, he said.

Georg Graf, professor at the University of Salzburg and the
institute's new executive committee chairman, said he "greatly
regretted" the resignation of the board members, adding he had the
impression their decision was based on a lack of information.

"The board members have expressed concern that they see the
institute's research independence at risk," Graf wrote in an
e-mail. "But these fears lack a realistic basis."

Graf said a "satisfactory solution" had been found regarding
access to the Jewish community's archive, describing it as one that
secures the independence and autonomy of research at the center.

Brigitte Bailer, Graf's deputy on the new executive committee,
confirmed that the archive issue had been resolved and expressed
confidence the center would still become an acclaimed institution.
She added that "one-sided misinformation" by Pelinka had
influenced board members.