Animal Services Trying To Avoid More Dog Shootings
Sign up today for breaking news and weather text alerts
Animal Services Trying To Avoid More Dog Shootings Save Email Print
Posted: 5:23 PM Jun 8, 2008
Last Updated: 5:23 PM Jun 8, 2008
Reporter: Daniel Chanin
Email Address: daniel.chanin@kolotv.com

A | A | A

A week has passed since a dog was shot and killed in small Washoe Valley neighborhood. As authorities continue an investigation, they're determined to try and prevent a similar incident from happening again in the future.

"It's very prudent that people think twice before using deadly force against an animal they see at large," says Lieutenant Mitch Schneider with Washoe County Regional Animal Services.

Schneider says his department gets nearly one thousand calls a year, from people complaining about aggressive dogs. And while he says things are improving, he's still concerned about owners failing to take responsibility.

"According to the law, you have an absolute duty to control your pet," says Schneider. "And if that pet is out there and it hurts somebody or causes an accident, then they are liable and will be held accountable as well."

One of many issues at hand stemming from last week's dog killing is whether or not it was the first time the animal had gotten loose. The pet's owner says it was, and the dog posed no threat..But the owner of the business insists the dog was a constant menace. Schneider says even if a person feels threatened by a dog, force is rarely justified.

"The absolute last resort is using deadly force. We kind of have to start thinking about pets the same way we would about taking a human life."

Anyone who encounters a dangerous or aggressive dog is encouraged to either walk away or try to restrain the animal. Schneider says calls to Animal Services are always appreciated, so trained professionals can handle a situation before it gets out of control.

"We would like to be proactive and have people report these things when they see it. So we can deal with it before something goes wrong."

More Stories
Boy Killed in Reno Car Crash

Another Union Agrees to Forego Raises

Ensign's Parents Gave Mistress's Family $96,000

Former Fallon Softball Coach Back in Court

Fighting Breast Cancer

3 Arrested, 1 Sought in Sparks Kidnapping, Rape

NTSB Blames Downdrafts in Steve Fossett Crash

Two Dead in Mammoth-Area Plane Crash

Post Your Comments
First Name:
Location:
Enter Comments: characters left
Email (optional):
By posting this comment I have read and agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy:
You must agree to the Terms of Service to continue.
Read Comments
Comments are posted from viewers like you and do not always reflect the views of this station.
Posted by: mike Location: sparks on Jun 16, 2008 at 02:18 PM
I have a big issue with this statement. ("The absolute last resort is using deadly force. We kind of have to start thinking about pets the same way we would about taking a human life.") No dogs are not humans and should not be treated as humans. thay are pets and should be treated as pets nothing more. It is scary to hear this type of thinking coming from a public servant. Sorry guys Nevada state law views dogs as livestock for a reason, and this should not be changed. Only California views pets as more than just animals. If the employe is found at fault he should be charged for the cost of the animal, thats it. if the owner is at fault she should pay for the losses of the company due her dog. Sounds like the dog ran off and came to an unfortunate end. Regardless of the shooting.

Posted by: Tony Location: Washoe Valley on Jun 12, 2008 at 10:23 AM
While I do not support allowing aggressive animals to freely roam our streets, the discharging of a firearm in a congested (posted on the same sign as the 'no large dogs roaming')area is far from a good idea and potentially far more dangerous. Please note, that the dog was not not even shot on property owned by the shooter.

Posted by: Dominic Location: Sparks on Jun 10, 2008 at 07:24 PM
As I said before, this is a perfect example of how people with no personal responsibility bring good business owners grief and endanger there property. If the dog’s owner had taken the responsibility of having a dog seriously, then this would not have been an issue. There should also be no reason that a PET should be treated as a "human life" as they are a beast of burden! Deadly force is your right to use if your property and or life is endanger. Period! A clean shoot is a clean shoot regardless of if you feel an animal should be considered a “human life”, because its not.

Posted by: Arthur Location: Reno on Jun 8, 2008 at 10:40 PM
First of all, you dont try to restrain an Agressive animal Nor do you run or show a weak side this animal will attack and to suggest that we sit and get bit full of holes while we wait for a trained profesional to arrive or let it kill or maim a loved one is a Stupid suggestion from any level.If these so called animal lovers want to find a way to keep the animal safe then keep them in the yard.We have the right as citizens to protect our loved ones which does include our pets to defend them at all cost though sad to have to kill a animal whos only wrong was having a Stupid owner.

KOLO Features
Northern Nevada Jobs
Find great local jobs here!
Coupons, Click Here!
Find great deals here!
Win a luxurious mattress set!
Enter to win today!
Stay-Cations
Find a Stay-Cation close to home!
HDTV Information
Everything you need to know about the Digital TV Transition.
Northern Nevada Medical Center
KOLO Online Poll
Do you think the word ‘HOE’ is too offensive for license plates?

Yes
No


Share Your Thoughts With Us!

Read the full story here
KOLO AP Online Videos
KOLO Blogs
Mistakes Happen, Decisions are Made! - Post Your Comments!
Help Murder Victim's Family this SATURDAY - 1 Comments Posted
Forget Michael Vick! - 8 Comments Posted
Welcome Back Carter - 1 Comments Posted
A Warning from Firefighters - 2 Comments Posted
More Blogs >>>
Stock Quotes
QUOTES
    Symbol Lookup