Sparks Pays Artist $250,000 to Settle First Amendment Case
Sign up today for breaking news and weather text alerts!
Save Email Print
Updated: 2:43 PM Apr 22, 2008
Sparks Pays Artist $250,000 to Settle First Amendment Case
The Sparks City Council has agreed to pay $250,000 to a street artist who sued the city five years ago over a violation of his First Amendment rights.
Posted: 2:15 PM Apr 22, 2008
Font Size:

SPARKS, Nev. (AP) - The Sparks City Council has agreed to pay $250,000 to a street artist who sued the city five years ago over a
violation of his First Amendment rights.

The council voted 4-1 on Monday to approve the settlement with San Francisco artist Steven White and his attorneys, Terri Keyser-Cooper and Diane Vaillancourt. The amount covers attorney fees and damages, said assistant city attorney Tom Riley.

The vote came hours after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the city's appeal of a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling in favor of White.

The case stems from 2003 when White sued the city over an ordinance that prohibited him from setting up his easel on the sidewalks and parks in the city and selling his paintings without a license.

City officials said the settlement ultimately saves the city about $80,000 from what the claim was expected to total. The council had rejected an opportunity to settle the case in January for $200,000 while appeals were still pending.

U.S. District Judge David Hagen in Reno ruled that the city's ordinance infringed on White's constitutional rights under the First Amendment.

The city appealed Hagen's decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and a three-judge panel ruled in White's favor last August.

"So long as it is an artist's self-expression, a painting will be protected under the First Amendment, because it expresses the artist's perspective," Judge Betty B. Fletcher said in the majority opinion. "White's paintings, which communicate his vision of the sanctity of nature, do more than propose a commercial transaction and therefore are not commercial speech."

The ruling made clear that not all artwork was protected, saying, "We expressly reserve the question whether all paintings merit First Amendment protection. We are not asked to decide the protection accorded to paintings that are copies of another artist's work or paintings done in an art factory setting where the works are mass-produced by the artist or others."

Council members John Mayer, Phil Salerno, Ron Smith and Mike Carrigan voted for the settlement. Councilman Ron Schmitt was opposed.

(Copyright 2008 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)


KOLO 8 News Now on Facebook
KOLO Features
Northern Nevada Jobs
Find great local jobs here!
Pro Football Picks
Play the Pro Football Game and win cash and prizes from the Peppermill each week!
Coupons, Click Here!
Find great deals here!
Stay-Cations
Find a Stay-Cation close to home!
HDTV Information
Everything you need to know about the Digital TV Transition.
KOLO Online Poll
Do you find that digital billboards impair your ability to drive at night?

Yes
No


Share Your Thoughts With Us!

Read the full story here
Northern Nevada Medical Center
KOLO AP Online Videos
KOLO Blogs
Covering Rural Nevada Alone part 5 - Post Your Comments!
"The Home of the Free?" I don't think so! - Post Your Comments!
Covering Rural Nevada Alone part 4 - Post Your Comments!
Covering Rural Nevada part 3 - 1 Comments Posted
Covering Rural Nevada alone part 2 - 1 Comments Posted
More Blogs >>>
Stock Quotes
QUOTES
    Symbol Lookup